<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Issue 17 &#8211; Cancer rates</title>
	<atom:link href="http://healthandenvironmentonline.com/issue-archive/cancer-rates/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://healthandenvironmentonline.com</link>
	<description>What environmental issues mean for health and healthcare</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 19 Dec 2011 09:56:16 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: The case for non-toxic buildings&#160;&#124;&#160;Eric Corey Freed</title>
		<link>http://healthandenvironmentonline.com/issue-archive/cancer-rates/#comment-270</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The case for non-toxic buildings&#160;&#124;&#160;Eric Corey Freed]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 16:30:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthandenvironmentblog.wordpress.com/?page_id=71#comment-270</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Where are the gloves and masks for the people who stay behind and have to live and work in these buildings? When I ask manufacturers about this, they defend their products. Unlike cigarettes, you cannot point to the formaldehyde in that one piece of furniture and say that was the cause of your cancer. But the collective exposure to thousands of chemicals in your home and office all contribute to your cancer risk. Although the death rate for cancer has dropped, thanks to early detection and treatment, the incidences of cancer continue to climb. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where are the gloves and masks for the people who stay behind and have to live and work in these buildings? When I ask manufacturers about this, they defend their products. Unlike cigarettes, you cannot point to the formaldehyde in that one piece of furniture and say that was the cause of your cancer. But the collective exposure to thousands of chemicals in your home and office all contribute to your cancer risk. Although the death rate for cancer has dropped, thanks to early detection and treatment, the incidences of cancer continue to climb. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: K+BB Collective&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The case for non-toxic buildings</title>
		<link>http://healthandenvironmentonline.com/issue-archive/cancer-rates/#comment-268</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[K+BB Collective&#187; Blog Archive &#187; The case for non-toxic buildings]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 May 2010 10:14:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthandenvironmentblog.wordpress.com/?page_id=71#comment-268</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] Where are the gloves and masks for the people who stay behind and have to live and work in these buildings? When I ask manufacturers about this, they defend their products. Unlike cigarettes, you cannot point to the formaldehyde in that one piece of furniture and say that was the cause of your cancer. But the collective exposure to thousands of chemicals in your home and office all contribute to your cancer risk. Although the death rate for cancer has dropped, thanks to early detection and treatment, the incidences of cancer continue to climb. [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] Where are the gloves and masks for the people who stay behind and have to live and work in these buildings? When I ask manufacturers about this, they defend their products. Unlike cigarettes, you cannot point to the formaldehyde in that one piece of furniture and say that was the cause of your cancer. But the collective exposure to thousands of chemicals in your home and office all contribute to your cancer risk. Although the death rate for cancer has dropped, thanks to early detection and treatment, the incidences of cancer continue to climb. [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Briefing: Top US cancer panel says chemicals causing “grievous harm” &#171; Health &#38; Environment</title>
		<link>http://healthandenvironmentonline.com/issue-archive/cancer-rates/#comment-235</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Briefing: Top US cancer panel says chemicals causing “grievous harm” &#171; Health &#38; Environment]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 20 May 2010 16:02:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://healthandenvironmentblog.wordpress.com/?page_id=71#comment-235</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[[...] chemicals with cancer and a range of other diseases. Since 1970, age-adjusted rates of many cancers have increased drastically (e.g. rates of NHL and prostate have [...]]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] chemicals with cancer and a range of other diseases. Since 1970, age-adjusted rates of many cancers have increased drastically (e.g. rates of NHL and prostate have [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

